<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question #165: How much better are the Rangers today than yesterday?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/</link>
	<description>Rick Carpiniello and Sam Borden debate the the hottest topics in sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:46:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Doodie Machetto,

Don&#039;t be scared of other teams. You should know Lundqvist is the best goalie in the league, and once we start rolling we&#039;ll be more than fine. You can do a lot with a goalie like Hank. The only team in the East that poses a threat, in my eyes, is New Jersey, and we all know how that story goes when Avery is in the mix. He&#039;ll get under Shanahan&#039;s skin too, and all those guys, you can bank on it. Despite how hot the Devils have been, we will be the team going into the playoff&#039;s hot, and they will cool down in the last 20, or however many games they have left. It will be interesting to see these last couple weeks pan out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doodie Machetto,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be scared of other teams. You should know Lundqvist is the best goalie in the league, and once we start rolling we&#8217;ll be more than fine. You can do a lot with a goalie like Hank. The only team in the East that poses a threat, in my eyes, is New Jersey, and we all know how that story goes when Avery is in the mix. He&#8217;ll get under Shanahan&#8217;s skin too, and all those guys, you can bank on it. Despite how hot the Devils have been, we will be the team going into the playoff&#8217;s hot, and they will cool down in the last 20, or however many games they have left. It will be interesting to see these last couple weeks pan out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodie Machetto</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodie Machetto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-835</guid>
		<description>&quot;We’ve quelled Pittsburgh’s fire all season, Kunitz doesn’t scare me. If we can contain Crosby and Malkin, I’m not worried about Kunitz.&quot;

I&#039;m not worried about Pittsburgh either. It&#039;s the teams that will make the playoffs I am concerned with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We’ve quelled Pittsburgh’s fire all season, Kunitz doesn’t scare me. If we can contain Crosby and Malkin, I’m not worried about Kunitz.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not worried about Pittsburgh either. It&#8217;s the teams that will make the playoffs I am concerned with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodie Machetto</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodie Machetto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-834</guid>
		<description>&quot;And exactly how many playoff games did Fleury and Bure play in a Ranger jersey?&quot;

That was hardly the fault of Bure or Fleury though. As I said with Fleury, the best offensive talent besides him on the team was Nedved. After Nedved it was Radek Dvorak or Mike York, or a washed up Graves. Name a decent defender on those teams besides Leetch. Schneider? 

Also, the coaching was just awful. Muckler? Low? 

Bure, as I stated earlier, played great in the 51 games he played. Fleury was also doing just fine. The problem was the guys around them, not them. Blame the GM for bringing in guys like Quintal, or MacLean, or Hatcher, or Lindros, or Maladog, or a 40 year old Messier, or Holik, etc.

At least Bure and Fleury played to the level that was expected of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And exactly how many playoff games did Fleury and Bure play in a Ranger jersey?&#8221;</p>
<p>That was hardly the fault of Bure or Fleury though. As I said with Fleury, the best offensive talent besides him on the team was Nedved. After Nedved it was Radek Dvorak or Mike York, or a washed up Graves. Name a decent defender on those teams besides Leetch. Schneider? </p>
<p>Also, the coaching was just awful. Muckler? Low? </p>
<p>Bure, as I stated earlier, played great in the 51 games he played. Fleury was also doing just fine. The problem was the guys around them, not them. Blame the GM for bringing in guys like Quintal, or MacLean, or Hatcher, or Lindros, or Maladog, or a 40 year old Messier, or Holik, etc.</p>
<p>At least Bure and Fleury played to the level that was expected of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-833</guid>
		<description>The chemistry will work out with the new in-your-face system we have going. As for the other teams, once we find our chemistry we can beat anyone so I&#039;m not that concerned. We&#039;ve quelled Pittsburgh&#039;s fire all season, Kunitz doesn&#039;t scare me. If we can contain Crosby and Malkin, I&#039;m not worried about Kunitz. In the long run it doesn&#039;t matter what other teams do, we control the season by how we play. Give it a couple games, you&#039;ll start to realize the amount of potential we have in the post-season. I do somewhat agree with the issue of us heading towards the Rangers of old throwing money around, however we never had the solid youth back then that we have now. Sure we had York, Malhotra and Knuble, but i don&#039;t think they compare to Staal, Callahan and Dubinsky, and even if you do think they do...York and those guys didnt mean half as much to the Rangers then, as Staal, Callahan and Dubinsky mean to the Rangers now. So it is not all that bad since we still have a solid foundation of youth. If any of the guys i mentioned gets traded for an older guy like a tkachuk in the offseason, then we can start pointing fingers, but until then...we really are in good shape, it could be a lot worse when you think of where we were 2 weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chemistry will work out with the new in-your-face system we have going. As for the other teams, once we find our chemistry we can beat anyone so I&#8217;m not that concerned. We&#8217;ve quelled Pittsburgh&#8217;s fire all season, Kunitz doesn&#8217;t scare me. If we can contain Crosby and Malkin, I&#8217;m not worried about Kunitz. In the long run it doesn&#8217;t matter what other teams do, we control the season by how we play. Give it a couple games, you&#8217;ll start to realize the amount of potential we have in the post-season. I do somewhat agree with the issue of us heading towards the Rangers of old throwing money around, however we never had the solid youth back then that we have now. Sure we had York, Malhotra and Knuble, but i don&#8217;t think they compare to Staal, Callahan and Dubinsky, and even if you do think they do&#8230;York and those guys didnt mean half as much to the Rangers then, as Staal, Callahan and Dubinsky mean to the Rangers now. So it is not all that bad since we still have a solid foundation of youth. If any of the guys i mentioned gets traded for an older guy like a tkachuk in the offseason, then we can start pointing fingers, but until then&#8230;we really are in good shape, it could be a lot worse when you think of where we were 2 weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twigs</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Twigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Doodie Machetto, all 3 of those guys had one thing in common, they weren&#039;t Rangers...never were.  And exactly how many playoff games did Fleury and Bure play in a Ranger jersey?

We had recently built an identity and a team full of guys that wanted to be here.  Now we are back to chasing names and throwing outlandish $$$ at has beens and, in some cases, never weres.  

Like take an IQ pointed out, no chemistry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doodie Machetto, all 3 of those guys had one thing in common, they weren&#8217;t Rangers&#8230;never were.  And exactly how many playoff games did Fleury and Bure play in a Ranger jersey?</p>
<p>We had recently built an identity and a team full of guys that wanted to be here.  Now we are back to chasing names and throwing outlandish $$$ at has beens and, in some cases, never weres.  </p>
<p>Like take an IQ pointed out, no chemistry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take An IQ Test Please</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Take An IQ Test Please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Adding size is one question but what is being overlooked is will the additions improve team chemistry?

Answer is no but it is not their fault because the chemistry was messed up before they got there thanks to Gomez and Drury.

The other missed point is how did the other teams fighting for a playoff spot do compared to the Rangers? 

Answer is that they added better parts (Pens with Kuntiz mainly) and chemistry (Canes with Cole) to help their playoff hopes than the Rangers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding size is one question but what is being overlooked is will the additions improve team chemistry?</p>
<p>Answer is no but it is not their fault because the chemistry was messed up before they got there thanks to Gomez and Drury.</p>
<p>The other missed point is how did the other teams fighting for a playoff spot do compared to the Rangers? </p>
<p>Answer is that they added better parts (Pens with Kuntiz mainly) and chemistry (Canes with Cole) to help their playoff hopes than the Rangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodie Machetto</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodie Machetto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Twigs, I&#039;m not sure I follow you with the three named you mentioned.

Kamensky was a complete disaster. I wouldn&#039;t count him with Fleury or Bure. 

Fleury had some good seasons with us. The year he went off the wagon he was an Art Ross threat (until he went into rehab). I mean, the first two years the other &quot;great&quot; offensive talent we had was Petr Nedved. After that it was Lindros. Fleury put up decent numbers.

Bure put up AMAZING numbers in a Rangers sweater. His problem was he retired due to injury 51 games later (12 the first year, 39 the second). Still managed to pot 41 goals in that time. If that were just one season, that would be a 66 goal pace. Even if you just take that second half season alone, it was a 40 goal pace. Injury is what ruined Bure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twigs, I&#8217;m not sure I follow you with the three named you mentioned.</p>
<p>Kamensky was a complete disaster. I wouldn&#8217;t count him with Fleury or Bure. </p>
<p>Fleury had some good seasons with us. The year he went off the wagon he was an Art Ross threat (until he went into rehab). I mean, the first two years the other &#8220;great&#8221; offensive talent we had was Petr Nedved. After that it was Lindros. Fleury put up decent numbers.</p>
<p>Bure put up AMAZING numbers in a Rangers sweater. His problem was he retired due to injury 51 games later (12 the first year, 39 the second). Still managed to pot 41 goals in that time. If that were just one season, that would be a 66 goal pace. Even if you just take that second half season alone, it was a 40 goal pace. Injury is what ruined Bure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twigs</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Twigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Does anybody else have a horrible feeling that we have reverted to the late 90&#039;s and early 2000 Rangers???  I can&#039;t get visions of Valeri Kamensky, Pavel Bure and Theo Fleury out of my head.  Maybe those years have colored me a skeptic but I am not willing to say that we are better today then we were yesterday.  Antropov is lazy, Avery is a head case and Morris is a chronic underachiever.  What type of message does it send to the youth in our organization when there&#039;s no room for a heart and soul guy like Prucha in your line up?  I hope they prove me wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody else have a horrible feeling that we have reverted to the late 90&#8217;s and early 2000 Rangers???  I can&#8217;t get visions of Valeri Kamensky, Pavel Bure and Theo Fleury out of my head.  Maybe those years have colored me a skeptic but I am not willing to say that we are better today then we were yesterday.  Antropov is lazy, Avery is a head case and Morris is a chronic underachiever.  What type of message does it send to the youth in our organization when there&#8217;s no room for a heart and soul guy like Prucha in your line up?  I hope they prove me wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Prucha will flourish in PHX...I&#039;m sure of it, but I&#039;m more focused on the Rangers now. It&#039;s important to play the system Tort&#039;s is preaching. The main problem was not all on the players, although we know who is over-payed and under-achieving, it was Renney and how he lost control of the team. We have the players for this season, it&#039;s all about Torts now. He will lead us to where we&#039;re destined in the post-season. It&#039;s up to the players to respond and step up to the plate. These new acquisitions of Antropov, Avery and Morris certainly fuel the fire the Rangers need. There is a new feeling in the locker room, but it is imoportant everything gels and everyone is comfortable in time for the playoffs. I do believe we have a great system going on now, and the right players to fit into it, it&#039;s all just a matter of time.

Go Rangers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prucha will flourish in PHX&#8230;I&#8217;m sure of it, but I&#8217;m more focused on the Rangers now. It&#8217;s important to play the system Tort&#8217;s is preaching. The main problem was not all on the players, although we know who is over-payed and under-achieving, it was Renney and how he lost control of the team. We have the players for this season, it&#8217;s all about Torts now. He will lead us to where we&#8217;re destined in the post-season. It&#8217;s up to the players to respond and step up to the plate. These new acquisitions of Antropov, Avery and Morris certainly fuel the fire the Rangers need. There is a new feeling in the locker room, but it is imoportant everything gels and everyone is comfortable in time for the playoffs. I do believe we have a great system going on now, and the right players to fit into it, it&#8217;s all just a matter of time.</p>
<p>Go Rangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Van</title>
		<link>http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/2009/03/05/question-165-how-much-better-are-the-rangers-today-than-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>John Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faceoff.lohudblogs.com/?p=665#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Dawes + Prucha = Avery + Andropov

Kalinen = Morris

Better today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawes + Prucha = Avery + Andropov</p>
<p>Kalinen = Morris</p>
<p>Better today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
