lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Faceoff

Rick Carpiniello and Sam Borden debate the the hottest topics in sports

Question #162: Will Steph in Boston bother you?

February
25

Now that the Stephon Marbury era has ended, will it bug you to see him in Celtic green? Do you think his very presence can bring down a champion? Or do you think he will help Boston repeat?

I have to toot my own horn here. I was one of the few who predicted the Knicks would give Marbury the Larry Brown treatment and just sit him and let him collect his salary (nearly $21 million). The strategy, I figured, was to hope for Marbury to do something egregious enough to forfeit some of the money, since he had no interest in negotiating a buyout for a lesser number.

Nor, I thought, should he take less. As distasteful as I’ve always found him as a person, the Knicks signed him to that contract and should have been responsible for it, even after he refused to play in their moment of desperation in November.

So, it turns out, apparently Marbury got all his money and now gets to go play with another team, presumably the NBA champs. How does that make you feel as a Knicks fan? Will you feel even worse if he plays well up there in Boston? Or are you just glad to get his snarling face out of here?

11:35 a.m., Sam says:

Sam Borden

Well, the Knicks DID save a few million bucks, it seems, so that’s something. But yes, essentially Marbury gets his money to go away. Not bad work if you can get it.

Seeing him in Boston won’t bother me at all, mostly because I don’t necessarily think we’ll actually see him in Boston that much. The Celtics need a little depth, yes, but if Marbury does anything – complains about not playing enough, is a distraction in any way, has sex with an intern in his truck and talks about it – that doesn’t jibe with the team concept, I think the Celtics will cut him loose and not lose any sleep about it. In other words, I’m not convinced he’ll be there come season’s end anyway.

If he is? No worries. The Knicks are better off without Marbury and, truthfully, I’m not sure any team is better off with him. At least not one that’s interested in winning on a consistent basis. Marbury’s talent can’t be ignored but he’s just not an ingredient for long-term success. I’ll be curious to see how Kevin Garnett deals with having Marbury around again, now that he’s finally in a spot where winning titles isn’t just a pipe dream.

Don’t fret, Knicks fans. Even if Marbury does OK in Boston, the Knicks are better off. This is the definition of addition by subtraction.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 25th, 2009 at 11:02 am by Carp. |

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
Rick Carpiniello and Sam Borden debate the hottest topics in sports.

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner





About the author
Sam BordenSam Borden grew up in Larchmont, graduated from Mamaroneck High School and has spent all 29 years of his life following the local sports scene. The drama of sports has always fascinated him, and his columns are designed to take a side or tell a story. The best days are the ones where he gets to do both.
Rick CarpinielloRick Carpiniello grew up in lower Westchester and began working in The Journal News' sports department (back when it was The Reporter Dispatch and eight other newspapers) in October of 1977 after a year of covering high school sports as a stringer. For more than 20 years he covered the New York Rangers and the National Hockey League. Carpiniello has been writing columns on everything from local sports to the big leagues since 2002.
Other recent entries

Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives
Links



Bad Behavior has blocked 346 access attempts in the last 7 days.